![]() |
EM 01 - Into Faraday's Law |
OPENING QUESTION: 1) Qualitatively state Gauss's Law for magnetic flux 2) By the by, what's a NIAB and why do we care? 3) While we're at it, what's so special about Ampere's Law and why is it soooo much easier to use than the BS Law? OBJECTIVES: I will be able to calculate induced emf using Faraday's Law during today's class. WORDS/FORMULAE FOR TODAY TERMS
CONSTANTS: UNITS:
FORMULAE:
WORK O' THE DAY: How is electric current created in a generator? Here's an interesting idea... how did the generation of electric current inspire Einstein as he was formulating his SPECIAL version of relativity? Work for today: Recall our equation for the magnetic flux through an enclosed area: ΦB = ∫B ∙ dA = 0 That equation states that for any enclosed area the magnetic flux in always equals the magnetic flux out.... which makes sense. Now let's combine that with the idea of inductance. Inductance is a property in physics whereby current can be started (induced) in a loop of wire by differing means:
For current to flow there must be an electric potential (specifically an emf) present which is directly related to the change in magnetic flux over time:
ε = -dΦB/dt Recall back to our dim, dark days of TORQUE that the torque experienced by a rotating wire is dependant on the number of coils of wire: τ = NIAB Similarly, the emf due to changing magnetic flux also depends on the number of coils of wire (N) ε = -NdΦB/dt Let's back up a bit--- recall that ΦB = ∫B ∙ dA = 0 We almost always evaluate the magnetic field as a constant (remember, that doesn't mean that the mag field doesn't change, it means that the magnetic field changes at a constant rate that goes with the distance "r" to the wire in question) If we also have a constant area (we usually do) then we can duck out of the integration and simply write the equation in the form: ε = -dΦB/dt substituting for B ε = -d(BAcosθ)/dt Which means that we can generate an emf by..... changing what? Notice again there is some potential confusion here.... we say that B and A are constant in order to dodge the integration, but then we talk about changing them... what's up with that?
════════════════════
HOMEWORK: Problem #1 on page 958 (this one is a bit surprising. Take extra care dealing with the author's use of the term "perpendicular". He uses that to refer to the orientation of the wire loop, NOT the AREA VECTOR of that loop. Also be ready to use the *definition* of a derivative when known quantities are involved) 3, 5 & 9 on page 958-9 |
| STUDY GUIDE: |